Roger Ebert
Here is a portion of an essay I found online, with an interesting sentence in the last paragraph. This statement parallels Madeleine L'Engle: "With my naked intellect I cannot believe in God."
I consider myself Catholic, lock, stock and barrel, with this technical loophole: I cannot believe in God.
Here is a portion of an essay I found online, with an interesting sentence in the last paragraph. This statement parallels Madeleine L'Engle: "With my naked intellect I cannot believe in God."
I consider myself Catholic, lock, stock and barrel, with this technical loophole: I cannot believe in God.
Roger Ebert, a Confused Catholic
Mar 12, 2013 @ 13:25 By scotmcknight
The morning hour in religion was my favorite class. As we
advanced through the grades, it began simply, in memorizing chapters from the
Baltimore Catechism, and concluded in eighth grade with the four lives of
Christ as told in the New Testament. We made a side tour through Genesis,
observing it’s “all the Jews have,” but cautioning that it was written as a
fable not to be taken literally. Some Protestants took it as fundamentalist
truth, but not Catholics or modern Jews.
That led us toward the Theory of Evolution, which in its
elegance and blinding obviousness became one of the pillars of my reasoning,
explaining so many things in so many ways. It was an introduction not only to
logic but to symbolism, thus opening a window into poetry, literature and the
arts in general. All my life I have deplored those who interpret something only
on its most simplistic level. I grant you that artworks like Andres Serrano’s
“Piss Christ” are hard to embrace and you will never find it displayed in my
home, but I understand the impulse behind it….
It was from these nuns, especially Sister Nathan and
Sister Rosanne, that I learned my core moral and political principles. I
assumed they were Roman Catholic dogma. Many of them involved a Social Contract
between God and man, which represented classical liberalism based on empathy
and economic fairness. We heard much of Leo XIII’s encyclical “Rerum
Novarum”–”On Capital and Labor.” When I hear self-appointed Catholic
“spokesmen” like William Donohue of the Catholic League, I wonder if he has
come across it in his reading.
Through a mental process that has by now become almost
instinctive, those nuns guided me into supporting Universal Health Care, the
rightness of labor unions, fair taxation, prudence in warfare, kindness in
peacetime, help for the hungry and homeless, and equal opportunity for the
races and genders. It continues to surprise me that many who consider themselves
religious seem to tilt away from me….
The great scandal in today’s Church is of course child
abuse. I have no idea what such surveys mean or what they’re based on, but
given how much I’ve read about it I was surprised to learn that only a little
more than four percent of today’s clergy seems to have been involved in it.
Birth control? Here I subscribe to an unofficial “double”
loophole often applied in practice by Catholics faced with perplexing choices:
Do that which results in the greater good and the lesser evil. I support
freedom of choice. My choice is to not support abortion, except in cases of a
clear-cut choice between the lives of the mother and child. A child conceived
through incest or rape is innocent and deserves the right to be born.
I consider myself Catholic, lock, stock and barrel, with
this technical loophole: I cannot believe in God. I refuse to call myself a
atheist however, because that indicates too great a certainty about the
unknowable. My beliefs were formed long ago from good-hearted Dominican
sisters, and many better-qualified RCs might disagree.
No comments:
Post a Comment